JFC supports robust and portable user interfaces.

WFC runs only on the Windows (32-bit) user interface, and uses Microsoft extensions to Java for event handling and ActiveX integration.

WFC performance is better than JFC.

Memory requirements for WFC are lower than for JFC.

WFC is easy to develop simple user interfaces.

It is difficult to build complex user interfaces with WFC than JFC.

In WFC, the details of any specific component are hidden within the component.

JFC provides a greater degree of control due to its object-oriented nature.