According to the standard, you can declare a full specialisation of a member function of a class template like this:template<typename T>class my_class {public: bool func(); // other functions};template<>bool my_class<int>::func();Unfortunately not all compilers support this. C++
Topic: Templates
Is it possible to specialise a member function of a class template without specialising the whole template?
Browse random answers:
What is a template?
Can we have "Virtual Constructors"?
How can you force instantiation of a template?
What is namespace?
When is a template a better solution than a base class?
How do you implement thread synchronization (Object.Wait, Notify,and CriticalSection) in C#?
What is a friend function & its advantage?
Differentiate between a template class and class template?
What is the Standard Template Library (STL)?
When is a template a better solution than a base class?
What are the Function templates ?
What are Class templates ?
Explain about Template specialization ?
Explain about Non-type parameters for templates ?
Explain the Templates and multiple-file projects ?
What are the syntax and semantics for a function template?
Differentiate between a template class and class template.
My compiler says that a member of a base class template is not defined in a derived class template. Why is it not inherited? template<typename T>class base {public: void base_func();};template<typename T>class derived : public base<T> {public: void derived_func() { base_func(); // error: base_func not defined }};
Is it possible to specialise a member function of a class template without specialising the whole template?
Why do I need to add "template" and "typename" in the bodies of template definitions?
Is there a difference between a function template and a template function, or between a class template and a template class?
